All posts by h716a5.icu

To follow-on or not?

ESPNcricinfo present the plays of the day from the third day at Headingley

David Hopps at Headingley26-May-2013Decision of the dayEngland’s decision not to enforce the follow-on brought much debate. They had a 180-run lead when they dismissed New Zealand for 174 (the follow-on figure was 150 because the first day was washed out), and until some last-wicket slogging brought 52 from five overs, they had taken nine wickets for 70 runs in 26 overs. Even after Neil Wagner and Trent Boult’s merry-making, they had still only been in the field for 43.4 overs.So why did they not follow-on especially with the risk of rain on the final day? The temptation is to suggest that England’s management had an eye on the Ashes. Absolutely no risk of overbowling their pace attack or, for that matter, Graeme Swann, who is not long back from an elbow operation, will be ta. There is also the fact that the follow-on is much more likely to go wrong for a four-bowler attack. But there was another reason – and it was that the pitch was still pretty flat as Alastair Cook emphasised with a blissful innings after tea.Ball of the daySwann’s three-wicket burst attracted most of the attention, but a delivery from Steven Finn also sticks in the memory. It was the first ball received by Tim Southee, cutting back steeply off a good length, and almost slicing him in two as he managed an inside edge. Finn, back on his full run, was approaching his best again – more good news for England.Anxiety of the dayNick Compton’s Ashes place is held to be under pressure, for all the protestations within the England camp that he has had a solid start to his Test career, and his anxiety was evident. He got off the mark to the first ball he faced, from Southee, with a dreadful shot – a foot-fast cut which sent the ball whistling behind square on the legside off an inside edge. He became ever more pensive and, even if you could advance a case that he had seen off the new ball, that he had played a team game by contentedly acting as second fiddle to Cook, and that Jonathan Trott was just as pawky, it was an unattractive, not to say limited, innings. The fact Compton had to await a New Zealand review for a clear bat-pad to forward short leg just added to his agony.Injury of the dayThe last thing New Zealand needed as they tried to recover self-respect was an injury to one of their pace bowlers. They suffered one all the same as Boult, who had taken the last two wickets to finish with 5 for 57, pulled out of the attack after aggravating a strained side after only two overs. Boult’s figures were his second best in Tests, outdone only by his six wickets against England in Auckland in March.

The run-out that should have been

Plays of the day from the IPL match between Sunrisers Hyderabad and Rajasthan Royals in Hyderabad

Sidharth Monga17-May-2013The non-appeal
In the sixth over of the Sunrisers Hyderabad innings, Biplab Samantray dabbed one towards point, took two steps down the pitch and came back in. Ajinkya Rahane swooped in sharply, and casually flicked the ball onto the stumps. The ball hit the stumps, but Samantray was only steps down, and was expected to have made it back. However, you could see he had been a bit lazy and didn’t quite slide the bat in. Except that Rahane was more worried about conceding the overthrow and went after the ball as opposed to appealing. The third umpire wasn’t called to adjudicate, but the replays showed Samantray was comfortably out. He added 47 off 34 in his second life.The first over
Rahul Dravid has relied on his spinners to squeeze in a cheap first over as the opposition batsmen watchfully get their feet in. In this game, though, Dravid had a bit of a problem. Both his spinners were in police custody for alleged spot fixing. Dravid pulled off another surprise, though, by asking Brad Hodge to bowl the first over. Yet again, Rajasthan Royals got away with another cheap first over as Hodge went for just three runs.The interaction
Amit Mishra took slowing the game down to a whole new level. Shane Watson had just walked in, Royals had lost two quick wickets, and Watson was eager to face. Mishra stood at the top of the mark. Watson waited. Then he smiled at Mishra, suggesting he is ready. He smiled bemusedly again. Mishra reacted to the overtures with a smile of his own, suggesting, “It’s coming, it’s coming.” No phone numbers were exchanged.The interview
The commentators’ interviews with a player on the field have ranged from the hilarious to the ridiculous, but this time they came close to costing a side a wicket. Darren Sammy had moved to slip, which Ramiz Raja didn’t notice, and started asking a question even as the bowler ran in. To make it worse, the batsman edged it, thankfully for Ramiz and Sammy sufficiently wide of slip. Ramiz said something to the effect of, “Oops this came almost right at you.” Sammy just chased after the ball.

That subcontinental summer

A new book on the 2011 World Cup is strong on travelogue, if not as much on the cricket itself

Suresh Menon07-Sep-2013Cricket, wrote Robert Winder, “is as much as anything, a form of travel”. This was in , one of the two finest books written on a World Cup. The other, by Mike Marqusee, is about the same World Cup, the one in the subcontinent in 1996. There is something about the tournament being held in South Asia – the travel, the guaranteed range of experiences, the peoples so much alike yet so different, the passion, the frustration – that is tempting to the writer looking for patterns and untold stories.The cricket stands for itself, of course; but it is also a symbol of something larger. “Everywhere it seems,” wrote Marqusee, “people want to harness cricket to nation.”As a World Cup travelogue, lacks the ambition of the two earlier books to which it will be compared, although other cricket-focused books on India’s 2011 World Cup win have been in the market for a couple of years now.The enormous work put in by the author is impressive. He watched cricket in 12 of the 13 venues, explaining, “I would no longer see the tournament through the sole lens of television. I was hitting the road to see what I might find.”Like India’s progress in the tournament, the book begins sluggishly before gaining in confidence and finding its feet. The vignettes around the periphery of the tournament are delightful. Thus we are told that the attitude of policemen in Delhi “flips from needlessly abrasive to pathetically deferential, depending on who they are dealing with”. Better editing would have changed that “who” into “whom”. It is a recurring problem through the book, where some fine passages are ruined by clumsy editing.The bright-eyed objectivity of the young author is both the strength and the weakness of the book. On the one hand it allows him to assess results dispassionately, to smile at the media’s lack of objectivity at MS Dhoni’s press conferences. On the other, this same lack of passion diminishes the energy that personal involvement can bring to a book on sport. So, while we have descriptions of matches and individual performances, we get to know precious little of the author’s feelings. A hint into his world is provided in the prologue, but that merely whets the appetite. The plan is an excellent one: to “write of a sport and simultaneously illuminate an entire culture, hold a mirror to an entire age”, and also to “understand my own childhood, of months and years consumed by cricket”.Sport is about passion, and while Vats is able to draw us into his world of travel, especially in the latter part of the book, we are not given a similar ride into his cricket or his own mind. Thus, better than the cricket is the travel, and better than the travel are the portraits of the characters he meets, the friends he makes, and cricket people around the country, including a teacher at his journalism college.Vats has the talent – enough to suggest he is a writer to be watched. After all, even Sachin Tendulkar had to wait till his 79th match for his first one-day century.Triumph in Bombay: Travels During the Cricket World Cup
by Vaibhav Vats
Viking Penguin
240 pages, Rs 399

It takes two to tango

Two greats look back on 20 years of friendship that has included World Cup heartbreak, a world-record stand, and missing a wedding

Interview by Jo Harman29-Nov-2013So guys, when did the two of you first meet?
Kumar Sangakkara: I think we would have been 15 or 16.Mahela Jayawardene: Yes, Kumar lived in Kandy and I lived in Colombo, but we played against each other maybe once or twice when we were at school and then we hooked up when he came to Colombo and started playing club and international cricket together. That’s when our friendship began to build.Any run-ins or rivalries between you in those early days?
MJ: No, not really! School cricket and club cricket was just a lot of fun.KS: And then when I got into the national side, Mahela was already vice-captain. We are the same age but Mahela was already playing Under-24 and A-team level when he was 17 and had been earmarked for national greatness.When did you start to become close friends and see each other outside of cricket?
KS: I think when we started playing international cricket together. We were in a team that had a lot of senior players and we were the same age and had a lot of similar interests.MJ: Yes, that’s a good point, because when I first came into the Sri Lanka side there was no one who was in my age group; Kumar was probably the first person of my age to come in after I made my debut in 1997. He came into the side in 2000 and as soon as he did we just clicked, because I needed somebody!KS: It wasn’t an intimidating dressing room, in fact it was a lot of fun, and Murali always spent a lot of time with the younger players. But it’s great when you have someone who shares your interests and you have a lot of things you can do and talk about, on and off the field.What were your first impressions of each other?
MJ: We have this joke in Sri Lanka about Kandy boys being a bit wild, but Kumar was quite different. He was in his element in international cricket, in the sense that he knows what he’s doing and he’s very focused and hard-working. Those were the first things I thought about him. Even when he first came into the side he was quick to learn, he was really working hard on his game and asking a lot of questions from the senior guys. Those are things we learned from each other as we tried to develop our game. Both of us helped each other quite a bit in that environment.KS: When I came into the national side Mahela had already scored hundreds and a double-hundred – 240 against India – and been the vice-captain, so he was my age but at the same time he was established and one of the best performers. It used to frustrate me watching him bat, because he never had to work hard like most of us; he had a lot of natural ability, grace and timing. He had the ability to score a lot of big runs at a young age, whereas I took about two years to get my first hundred in Test cricket. So there were a lot of things I learnt off Mahela: how he handled the dressing room, how he handled the seniors, the way he carried himself. It was great to be able to chit-chat about that and then to cement the friendship by spending a lot of time together.What are some of your best memories together over the years?
MJ: The best memories are our travelling adventures. Every time we go on tour we tend to feed off each other and both of us just love the game of cricket, so we would ask questions of others and then just keep talking about how we could improve.KS: It’s about enjoying the countries that we are in. We love to try out food, see the culture… have a good time basically.MJ: It’s not easy when you’re travelling and playing the game for 15 years or more, and you need that friendship to carry you through. You tend to make mistakes on the field and off the field sometimes and you need somebody to talk to and get their views to get it right. We’ve enjoyed that brilliantly. But we’ve also had our banter… we’re very competitive on and off the field!A run-glut in Colombo

Having won the toss and elected to bat, South Africa posted what looked a well below-par 169 but the tourists were given a glimmer of hope when Dale Steyn removed both Sri Lankan openers inside four overs. What followed was the highest partnership first-class cricket had ever seen – a record that still stands today.
Sangakkara began shakily, as he was put down in the gully and bowled by a no ball. From then on there was no let-up though; he and his partner, Jayawardene, each reaching his half-century before stumps on day one and batting through the entirety of the second day to bring up their double tons.
That evening, with history beckoning, the friends tried to relax and took their wives out to dinner at a local Thai restaurant. Then, on day three, they ploughed on, first passing Sanath Jayasuriya and Roshan Mahanama’s record of 576 for the highest Test partnership and then Vijay Hazare and Gul Mohamed’s first-class record of 577. Each landmark was greeted with an impromptu blast of fireworks.
Sanga eventually fell for 287, after 675 minutes at the crease, but his partner continued to churn out the runs, eclipsing Jayasuriya’s innings of 340, the highest by a Sri Lankan, before finally falling 26 runs short of Brian Lara’s Test record 400 to the dismay of the home fans. In 752 minutes at the crease, Jayawardene had faced 572 balls and hit 43 fours and one six. He declared immediately after his dismissal, giving Murali enough time to bowl out South Africa for an innings victory.

Do you ever argue?
KS: Oh yes, plenty!MJ: Especially when we play our warm-up games, our football matches and various silly things.KS: It makes enjoying the dressing room a lot easier when things get tough, when there are things you can’t control, that you have someone there who you can sit down with and have a laugh about it with.Your most famous partnership is of course your 624-run stand against South Africa in 2006, which remains the highest-ever partnership for any wicket in first-class cricket. How did you keep each other going through that?
KS: We were just having a good time, talking about a lot of things, including what we would be eating for dinner, I think! The only time tension set in was when we got close to the world record. We were only aware of it for the last bit.MJ: Yes, I think we had a tea break just before we reached the record and when we went back to the dressing room we had no idea how close we were. We knew that Sanath [Jayasuriya] and Roshan [Mahanama] held the record, but we weren’t sure how close we were to it until the tea break when someone said we were ten or 11 runs away from breaking the record. I was particularly nervous, because it’s not an individual thing and you can’t let your partner down. Those last few runs were very tense!KS: It’s nice that two good friends hold that record. I don’t think we ever set out to break it, it just happened.MJ: I think the match situation dictated the partnership purely because when we went in we were in trouble so we were not actually thinking about a big partnership, we were just trying to get through that period against a good South African bowling attack. We were about 14 for 2 when I joined Kumar and we were just trying to bat through long periods, we never had a thought of a big partnership like that. But I think that’s how these things happen – you don’t really think about it.Is it true that you were best men at each other’s wedding?
KS: Not quite, no. Mahela’s wife was maid of honour at my wedding.MJ: And Kumar was meant to be the best man at my wedding but he wasn’t in the country! The wedding was fixed for a date but then a tour got rescheduled and got tangled up in the week of my wedding. I had to fly back from India for my wedding and none of my team-mates could be there.KS: It was a real shame. I was in India playing a one-day series. Mahela had to skip back to Sri Lanka for a couple of days.MJ: I only missed one game because they forced me to come back after the wedding!But you’ve also had your tough times together too?
KS: Yes, we’ve had our tough times. We’ve had tough times when we’ve lost four World Cup finals, we’ve had tough times when we’ve lost overseas, and we’ve had tough times in Sri Lanka.MJ: But we’ve stuck together and we’ve helped each other out in those situations. We’ve had conversations about how to get through those tough times. It makes a big difference having Kumar there. It’s not about saying “yes” to everything, it’s about asking each other questions about why we’re doing something and asking if we can maybe do something differently. Having a different opinion can help each other. Playing in Sri Lanka is not always the easiest, with lots of things happening, so often you need that bit of advice.You two have been such a huge part of Sri Lankan cricket for so many years. Do you see it as your duty to lay the foundations for the future of the national side?
KS: I think that’s any player’s responsibility really, to leave cricket a better place and to leave the dressing room an easier place to come through; to set foundations and guide with advice. But at the end of the day I think our responsibility is very simple: to play Test cricket to the best of our ability so we can inspire young players to reach those standards. Mahela has got close to 11,000 Test runs, over 11,000 one-day runs, over 30 hundreds. What better way to inspire the next generation than to do what he’s done? To play the game in such a manner, to win games for Sri Lanka, to leave that legacy.MJ: There have been a lot of foundations laid by a lot of Sri Lankan cricketers over the years and our challenge was to take Sri Lankan cricket forward from where it was. We are a tiny island and what we’ve accomplished is amazing and we’re passionate about our game and very proud we’re playing for our country. We want to see new players coming through, breaking our records and going further forward, because that means we’ll have done a good job in giving them a pathway.And when you do both retire, the partnership continues?
KS: Of course. We’ve already started a couple of ventures together.MJ: Most of the things we’ve started are together, in charity work and other business ventures, so we’ll definitely be partners for quite some time I think! It’s been fun and it’s a fantastic friendship we have on and off the field. It’s not overshadowing each other. It’s a very healthy partnership; we feed off each other and we complement each other.

'Wearing the Bengal jersey is my motivation'- Shukla

Laxmi Shukla hasn’t played for India since 1999, but the allrounder doesn’t have any regrets. Irrespective of the stage, Shukla has always given his best, and this season, he has led by example to guide a young Bengal team to the Ranji Trophy semi-finals

Rachna Shetty17-Jan-2014″I was informed over the phone that I was picked for the Indian team. I was very excited and everyone – my family, friends, area, mohalla – was happy. That was the outstanding moment of my life. I hope, . [I hope maybe sometime in the future, I get the news on the phone or through a message telling me I’ve been selected.]”The last time Laxmi Shukla, allrounder and current captain of Bengal, wore India colours was in September 1999, back when he was supposed to be one of the many next Kapil Devs. Six months earlier, he had made his ODI debut against Sri Lanka in Nagpur – he didn’t bat and in his four overs conceded 32 runs. Two games later, he was dropped from the ODI side. Nearly 15 years later, Shukla is insistent there is little rancour as he looks back on his career. Neither is he bitter about having missed the chance of playing a Test, after coming so close.Shukla made his first-class debut at the age of 16, in 1997, and less than two years later, was playing an ODI for India. If your chance comes at such a young age, never to show up again for the next 15 years, you begin to wonder what if that opportunity had come when you were a little more mature. Not with Shukla, though. He wouldn’t have had it another way.”When I got the chance, I came into the team because of my performances,” Shukla says. “After that, when I played two unofficial games against Pakistan in 1999, I took 10 wickets. I didn’t get to play a Test after that. I performed even then, but I was removed from the team. Still, I am not disappointed. A person gets an opportunity when he does well. So I will not be disappointed. I choose to be positive. I lost a few years due to injury. I am trying to do well, sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn’t. I will keep trying and [gods will relent some day].”Shukla has had some impressive patches in the interim, including one of his most successful seasons in 2011-12, where he scored 294 runs and took 12 wickets to help Bengal win their maiden one-day Ranji Trophy title. In the final against Mumbai, Shukla took four wickets and struck an unbeaten hundred to secure the title. Performances in that season helped him win the Lala Amarnath Award for the best allrounder in the 2011-12 season.Between 2002 and 2004, the period he considers his lowest point due to a heel injury that forced him to play solely as a batsman, Shukla scored 492 List A runs and more than 900 first-class runs. In this season, he has played an almost talismanic role guiding to the semi-final a young Bengal side, which has lost Manoj Tiwary to injury, and Mohammed Shami and Wriddhiman Saha to national duty. He has scored 584 runs at an average of 53, including two hundreds. Along the way he has become the first cricketer from Bengal to play more than 100 Ranji Trophy games.Shukla still remembers the excitement of playing his first season in domestic cricket at the age of 16. “When I made my first-class debut, there were lots of senior players like Sourav and Saba Karim, Utpal Chatterjee, and they all backed me,” Shukla says. “I remember that I was very excited after finishing the Under-19 World Cup and getting to play here. When I got picked in the Ranji Trophy team, I thought it was a big milestone of my life. When you know you are getting to play for your state team at the age of 16, I feel there can be few greater joys. To play for and represent a state in which you were born and then captain the side is a big thing. It’s a feeling of great pride.”For Shukla, cricket is such a passion that he needs little external motivation. He is almost philosophical when he talks about his commitment and ambitions on the domestic circuit. “The dream is always to play for India,” he says. “But right now, my focus is only on Bengal. I have to play a match for them. There’s no point focusing on an India place now. That depends on performance, and you get that chance if you keep performing.”When people ask me how I feel that I didn’t play more for India, that I should have played 150 ODIs, I tell them I feel very good because I played those many games for Bengal. To wear the Bengal jersey is a matter of great pride. People tell me I should have played many matches for India, I won the allrounder’s award but I am still not picked. How do I stay motivated? And I tell them, ‘Wearing the Bengal jersey and the cap is a motivation, my family is a motivation for me. So I don’t need to find motivation elsewhere. I am fortunate to be born in a place as emotional as West Bengal.'”So far things are going good, but things can never be only good in a person’s life. There are ups and downs. But if you’re sincere and you work hard, then the bad times become less. So for me, the goal is that until I play cricket, to play the game honestly. I should never have to feel that if I had worked a little more, I would have played more. When I quit cricket and analyse my career, I should be able to feel that I gave my full effort and I was honest in my work. I never cheat myself.”Up ahead is the semi-final against Maharashtra in Indore, which begins on Saturday. Shukla was a part of the squad the last time Bengal reached a Ranji Trophy semi-final, in 2006-07, and their campaign then ended in failure as they lost to Mumbai in the final. This time around, Bengal will do well to take a leaf from their captain’s book: when they look back at the season, they shouldn’t feel they could have done more.

ECB profit could be England's loss

The visit of India will swell the coffers of English cricket but there could be a greater cost in the long term

George Dobell in Nottingham07-Jul-2014Cricket is no longer measured in terms of victories and defeats. Not predominantly, anyway. It is measured in terms of profit and loss.How else could it come to pass that two middle-ranking Test teams would come to carve up the management of the cricket world? How else could it come to pass that, while the 2012 series between South Africa and England to decide the No. 1 Test spot was played over just three Tests, the world’s fourth- and fifth-rated sides will now contest a five-match series in the space of 42 days? How else could it come to pass that the same business plan that has earned the ECB more money than ever before is also responsible for hindering the ability of its team to compete at their optimum level?It is because cricket in England is about money, not merit.The summer of 2014 will earn the ECB more money than any that has preceded it. Such is the value of the television audience that India generates, the season will earn even more than 2013, when England hosted an Ashes series and a Champions Trophy. That is despite one side having not won in eight successive Tests and the other having not won away in more than three years. If this were a boat race, you might expect both sides to sink.Stuart Broad expressed some reservations about the pitches for the India series•PA PhotosThere are many positive aspects of the ECB’s wealth. It has allowed them to retain the services of their best players despite the threat of T20 leagues. It has allowed them to retain an army of support staff so large that, at times, they outnumber the playing squad. It has allowed the ECB to lead the world in the funding of disability cricket and to bring a new level of professionalism to women’s cricket. It has allowed them to spend heavily on grass-roots cricket; building new facilities at clubs around the country and ensuring the continued existence of the 18-county domestic game.But it also comes at a cost. By squeezing so many Tests into such a short window, the ECB is giving England’s leading pace bowlers – the same bowlers that present the best chance of victory – little possibility of performing at their best. And, in the longer term, it risks those players in greatest demand leaving the game prematurely through burn-out (Jonathan Trott) or injury (Graeme Swann). In 2015, those players – and coaches – involved in all formats will spend around 300 days in hotels. Too much is asked of them.Equally, the desire – an admirable desire – to ensure as little time off the pitch as possible has seen new drainage installed at most grounds. That has led not just to quick-drying outfields, but quick-drying pitches. The days of green seamers are largely gone and, with them, England’s home advantage. India may not have realised it yet, but the pitches in this series may help their spinners more than England’s seamers.Across English cricket, decisions are taken which bring short-term financial gain but will cost in the longer term. From selling all live TV rights to a subscription broadcaster, to diluting the value of the Ashes by playing too many limited-overs series against Australia, the ECB is risking the long-term health of the game while claiming it is earning more than ever before. The administrators need to understand that sport, like schools and hospitals, cannot be judged purely on the bottom line.Eventually there is a danger that, if England continue to play on low, slow wickets, if they continue to play jaded cricket, if they continue to be absent from free-to-air TV, if they continue to lose and play the same opposition, the value of broadcast rights and ticket sales will diminish. But, by then, the current management will have moved on and will be able to look back and say that all was okay on their watch.They were points touched upon, albeit gently, by Stuart Broad as he looked ahead to the Test series. Broad, who looked weary by the end of the two-Test series against Sri Lanka, expressed his concern at the schedule and the grounds’ new drainage.

“If the pitches are dry, I think India will be licking their lips with the two spinners, won’t they?”Stuart Broad

“Back-to-back Test cricket does really tire you out,” Broad said. “This schedule’s got five Test matches in the space of probably three, so it is pretty hectic. We will have to look after our bodies, big time. Part of the reason we had a camp last week was to get a lot of cricket work in before the series started. Once we get underway there’s just no training time really.”The clubs have all spent huge money on all these drainage systems to make sure we can get out on the field. But I don’t know how much research was done into what they do to the pitches. I know our players, three or four years ago, brought the theory up that they were making the wickets too dry, too early and it is quite hard to keep bounce in the wickets now unless you leave them really green, which Test match wickets just don’t do.”So it is a bit of an issue we’re suffering, with pitches bouncing three or four times to the keeper. I think Test wickets should be flat, no doubt, because the crowds want to come and see runs scored. But if you catch the edge of a batsman it’s got to carry to the keeper and the slips, that’s the number one rule.”It didn’t happen at Lord’s and Headingley. They turned out to be really slow and both really should have been draw wickets. It will be interesting to see how this series plays out. But, if they’re dry, I think India will be licking their lips with the two spinners, won’t they?”It seems they may not. Perhaps influenced by Duncan Fletcher’s previous experience of English pitches – which might prove to be somewhat dated – it seems India may select a side bursting with seamers and with only one spinner.In the short term, England may retain the seam-bowling depth to defeat an India side who have not won a single Test away since June 2011. In the longer term, if they really want to enjoy a sustained period among the best teams in the world, they need the ECB to devise a new business plan that looks to the benefit of the whole game, not just the bottom line.

Batsmen show no stomach for fight

The conditions were difficult for batting in Mirpur, but both India and Bangladesh batted as though they were playing on a flat pitch

Alagappan Muthu in Mirpur17-Jun-2014Mirpur wore a forbidding grey on Tuesday. Rain made a promised appearance and disrupted play for two and half hours. The game resumed, but the sky refused to clear. Lateral movement was almost assured. This had become the first session of a Test, but neither India nor Bangladesh paid proper mind to the change in conditions.The batsmen needed to be smart about their scoring areas. Survival should have taken precedence, especially when the match had been reduced to 41 overs and the D/L method placing a premium on wickets. Yet even a man in form like Robin Uthappa went for an awful hoick 14 balls after the rain break to lob a simple catch to mid-off. Tamim Iqbal, another opener, pranced down the track and nicked to the keeper. His target was only 106.Stuart Binny wafted at a back of a length delivery wide outside off stump and edged it. Mahmudullah offered a lazy drive and his open face was snapped up at gully. This was not the average limited-overs encounter in the subcontinent. The ball was zipping about and it’s holders only needed to place it in the right areas. The play was entirely in the batsmen’s hands but neither team was willing to guts it out. In the end, the second ODI went down in history as the lowest scoring one for the loss of all 20 wickets.Credit should be heaped on Bangladesh’s 19-year old destroyer, Taskin Ahmed, but he was bowing at batsmen who had chosen to hit their way out of trouble when another rain interruption, or even a washout, could not be ruled out. The majority of Bangladesh’s menace came in the form of two bowlers – the leader Mashrafe Mortaza and the debutant Taskin. India succumbed to their third-worst collapse in terms of overs faced.Cheteshwar Pujara spent the longest time at the crease – 66 minutes of being beaten or enduring outside edges. He could not ferret out any singles. He had waited, but waited too long. The batsmen who followed him took a different route and only one of them reached double-figures. No one tried to bat the full 41 overs.Bangladesh were worse, stumbling to their joint-worst score in ODIs. Binny’s medium-pace combined well with the conditions and he had three wickets before he had completed his second over – a flick cut short by midwicket, an on-the-up drive caught at gully and a nick down leg to the keeper. Reward for persistent bowling without breaking a sweat. It was that sort of “damp and sticky” pitch that was “ideal to bowl” on, in the words of Binny himself, but an international game merited a better display by the batsmen.At least that was what the sparse crowd had come in and stayed through the rain for. Every Bangladesh wicket had them clutching at their hair. The emotion seeped into the press box too, a merry place, even when the home side falls short of expectations. Today the atmosphere was tinged with additional excitement, born from seeing a genuine quick run through the opposition. The racket was loud and genial, their appreciation for Taskin’s wholehearted display was as clear as the smile he wore when walking off the field. They were all wary, though, and in the end the happy buzz was gone, substituted by a jarring creaking of the chairs they were sat on.It was bowlers’ day out in Mirpur and they had nothing opposing them.

Jimmy's bunny

Stats highlights from the third day of the fourth Investec Test between England and India

Bishen Jeswant09-Aug-20140 Number of times that England have lost a Test after securing a 200-plus run lead at the end of the first innings. England have been in this situation on 166 occasions, and never lost a single one of those Tests, winning 129 and drawing 37.14 Number of times that India have lost a Test inside three days. Five of these instances have been in England (and six in all against them), with the last of those coming at Edgbaston in 1967. Most recently, India capitulated inside three days against Australia in Perth, in 2012.195.1 The number of overs bowled in this match, which is the fewest in an India-England Test that has produced a result. India batted only 89.4 overs in this Test, which is the second lowest number of overs in a Test against England. The fewest number of overs played by India in a Test against England is 58.1, also at Old Trafford.5 Number of times that the seventh wicket has posted 100-plus runs during an Old Trafford Test. Jos Buttler and Joe Root added 134 runs today. The last time that the seventh-wicket pair added 100-plus runs at Old Trafford was in 1990, when Manoj Prabhakar and Sachin Tendulkar were involved in an unbroken 160-run stand – a record that still stands.416 Number of deliveries sent down by Pankaj Singh before he picked up his first wicket, in his 70th over. Till that point, Pankaj had conceded 274 runs and was in the record books as the bowler to have conceded the second highest number of runs in a wicketless career. Pankaj, however, was a long way from the record for the most balls bowled before picking up a wicket. India’s AG Kripal Singh bowled 108.3 overs before picking up his first Test wicket.22.25 Cheteshwar Pujara’s Test batting average in 2014. As of December 2013, his average was 66.25. Pujara has scored six hundreds and five fifties in his Test career, but has hit only one half-century this year.7-4 James Anderson’s figures against Virat Kohli in the current series. Kohli did not score a single run off Anderson in three of the six innings he faced him. Overall, Anderson has dismissed Kohli five times and only conceded 30 runs from ten innings.66-6 India faced the ignominy of seeing the number of the devil twice on the scoreboard during the Old Trafford Test, which was the fourth time that they had been six down for a score of 66 or less in both innings of a Test, including once previously at Old Trafford itself. The last instance of this happening was against West Indies in 1983.19 Number of wickets taken by Moeen Ali in this series, which is the second highest by an England spinner against India in a home series. The record is held by Ray Illingworth who took 20 wickets against India in 1967. Moeen’s 19 scalps is also the fourth highest that any spinner has taken in series against India outside the subcontinent.0 Number of 50-plus partnerships that the Indian openers have posted during this tour. There have been six previous tours to England where the Indian openers have failed to reach fifty even once. During India’s successful tour in 2007, the openers averaged 53.7, but only 19.5 during the disastrous 2011 tour.

The swashbuckling flight lieutenant

Keith Miller lived his life and played his cricket king-size

Ashley Mallett03-Nov-2014Arguably Keith Miller was cricket’s greatest swashbuckler. Larger than life, he leapt straight at you from the pages of .He was born in November 1919, named after airmen brothers Keith and Ross Smith, who were creating world aviation history with their first epic flight from England to Australia. He never lost his stamina or zest for life. Miller whacked sixes, backed horses, had film-star looks, bowled bouncers, caught blinders and attracted beauties.He flew night missions over Germany and Occupied France in his Mosquito, bombing and strafing Nazi rocket bases. The stories from his war days are legion.Michael Parkinson quizzed him about the pressure in the Test arena once. “Pressure?” Miller asked, “There’s no pressure in Test cricket. Real pressure is when you are flying a Mosquito with a Messerschmitt up your arse!”Flight Lieutenant Miller’s love of classical music compelled him on one mission to turn his Mosquito back to the war zone. Taking a slight detour, he flew over Bonn, Beethoven’s birthplace.One day at Great Massingham, Norfolk, Miller fought to control his plane as he came in to land. The starboard engine was spurting flame and Miller crash-landed the ailing aircraft, which lost its tail on impact with the ground.Miller once flew up the straight at Royal Ascot one clear Saturday afternoon and another day he buzzed the Goodwood track. His commanding officer gave Miller a dressing down, calling him an “utter disgrace to the air force”.How the worm turned.During the Australian team’s tour of England in 1953, Miller, resplendent in top hat and tails, drove to Royal Ascot in a gleaming Rolls Royce. As he drove into the car park he noticed that the attendant was none other than his old RAF Commanding Officer. Miller stepped from his vehicle and, pretending not to have recognised his ex-CO, said in his best official voice, “Ah, my good fellow. Park my Rolls in the shade, will you? That’s a good chap.”A week or two earlier Lindsay Hassett’s Australians had visited Buckingham Palace. Miller was rumoured to have been friendly with Princess Margaret, and when he emerged from the bus he began to wander from the vehicle and headed towards a distant building.”Nugget, where are you going?” Hassett asked.”Oh, it’s okay, skipper. I know of another entrance here,” came the reply.For much of the war, Miller was based near Bournemouth. Every Friday night it became tradition for Miller and his mates from the RAF base to meet at the Carlton Hotel in Bournemouth. One fateful Friday night, Miller couldn’t make the regular appointment and when he returned he found the town barricaded after a German raid. A Focke-Wulf fighter bomber had strafed the church next to the hotel, causing the church spire to collapse directly on to the front bar, instantly killing his eight mates. Each year for more than 50 years Miller returned to England and spent time with a relative of each of his mates killed that tragic night in 1943.Miller’s attacking batting and brilliant fast bowling made an instant impact in world cricket when he impressed as an allrounder in the Victory Tests in 1945. He scored 514 runs in the series, including a brilliant 185 at Lord’s, where he hit Eric Hollies for seven sixes, one of the hits crashing into the top of the Lord’s pavilion.Miller bowls in the nets at Lord’s in 1948•PA PhotosJohn Arlott once wrote that Miller seemed to be “busy living life in case he ran out of it”. Miller found a classical-music soulmate in Neville Cardus and had an equally good rapport with the great conductor Sir John Barbirolli.Miller never captained Australia but he did lead New South Wales with distinction in the 1950s. Richie Benaud regards Miller as the best captain “never to have captained his country”, for the way he led by instinct and by example.In November 1955, Miller’s New South Wales struggled to 215 for 8 on the first day of a Sheffield Shield match against South Australia. At stumps Miller declared the innings closed and then partied long and hard to celebrate the birth of his first child. His NSW team-mates were already on the ground when Miller arrived the next morning, so he hurriedly tossed on his cricket gear, his bootlaces trailing as he wandered onto the ground. When he focused his bleary eyes on the wicket, they opened wide, for the wicket was green as a tree frog.Left-arm paceman Alan Davidson had already measured out his 15-paced approach and was eager to bowl the first ball. He was standing at the top of his mark when Miller approached.”Ahem, now Davo, I think you can do a job for us today,” Miller said before turning his back and walking down towards the stumps and the beginning of the green pitch. He stopped, turned around and waved to Davidson. “Ah Davo, try the other end, I’ll have a go here.”Within a few overs South Australia were dismissed for 27. Miller took a career-best 7 for 12. Davidson didn’t get a bowl.As NSW captain, Miller’s legend grew. Once, someone alerted him to the fact that there were 12 men on the field. “It seems we have too many men out here,” Miller said. “Will one of you blokes piss off?”In 55 Tests between 1946 and 1956, he took 170 wickets at 22.97 and scored 2958 runs at 36.97. He also pulled off some wonderful catches in the slips. He was agile, some said he possessed lightning reflexes and moved swiftly and gracefully, like a panther.

****

In 1969 I was invited by the NSW Cricket Association to take part in making a coaching film. The event was sponsored by the Rothmans Sports Foundation. I was rapt at getting the chance to spend time in the company of Alan Davidson and Keith Miller. Each of us was required to bowl a couple of balls at a set of stumps on the SCG No. 2 Ground.Miller borrowed some gear and as he walked past me, he said, “Ahem, I’ll pitch leg and hit off.” He did not measure out his run. He simply wandered back a few paces, turned and began his approach. Despite being 50, not having bowled a ball in a decade, he moved in with the grace and power of a finely tuned racehorse. The ball left his hand seam up. It came from a fair height, for Miller stayed “tall” throughout and the ball pitched on the line of leg stump and hit the top of off. He bowled three balls and two of his deliveries pitched leg and hit off. Then he walked away. It was the most amazing thing I’ve seen in cricket.Benaud once confessed to Miller: “You know, Keith, I wish I had been given the chance to bowl to Don Bradman. I came into the side just too late.” Miller coughed and replied, “Ahem, Richie, my boy, your not having to bowl to Bradman was your one lucky break in cricket.”Miller and Bradman chat during a charity event in London in 1974•PA PhotosLen Hutton, one of the greatest England batsmen of all time, always found Miller a handful. “He’d just as likely bowl me a slow wrong’un first ball of a Test match as he would an outswinger or a searing bouncer,” Sir Len told me in Adelaide in 1984. “Keith was the greatest bowler I ever faced in Test cricket.”Miller admired Hutton’s cricket too, and when I once pressed him about the relative merits of Hutton and Geoff Boycott’s batting, Miller said: “Both were fine players. Hutton had a far greater range of attacking strokes, but defensively I reckon they were pretty much on a par.” He then looked at me and smiled, “But for heaven’s sake, don’t tell Boycott!”Miller greatly admired the skill of Bradman, but he didn’t quite know how great the Don was until he bowled to him in a match after his retirement. “I decided to bowl a few short ones, “just to test his reflexes,” Miller said. “First one was a medium-fast bouncer. It didn’t get up too far, but Don was swiftly into position and he smashed it like a rocket past mid-on.”Fast bowlers don’t like that treatment, so I charged in for the next ball and gave it my all. It was a tremendous bumper, straight at his head, but he simply swung into position and cracked it forward of square, almost decapitating Sam Loxton on its way to the fence. If Bradman was ‘better’ in the 1930s he must have been some player.”So too Keith Ross Miller, Australia’s greatest allrounder.

MS Dhoni runs into finishing trouble

MS Dhoni the lethal, calculated finisher has gone missing of late; maybe it’s time he took the pressure off himself and batted higher up the order, in order to regain his last-overs mojo ahead of the World Cup knockouts

Sidharth Monga29-Jan-2015Question: MS, you are so good at finishing matches off. Just the last six months or so haven’t gone to plan. Why do you think that’s happening?MS Dhoni: Because [against] West Indies I didn’t bat, Sri Lanka I didn’t play, and now just two matches. Last six months that was the schedule for us.Question: New Zealand, a couple of times. There have been other occasions.Dhoni: That was one year back.Question: But why do you think…

****

The line of questioning here, just after India had lost to England in Brisbane, and Dhoni’s response say it all. It is a fair question albeit with an incorrect timeframe. It has been more than just the last six months. Dhoni is perhaps the greatest finisher ODI cricket has had. Yet he hasn’t been finishing games off of late as well as he used to. His last real match-winning innings in an ODI was a quintessential Dhoni iceman finish when he absorbed all the pressure with the tail for company before turning into a one-on-one with Shaminda Eranga in the final over and winning it.That innings, though, came in July 2013. Somewhere Dhoni, too, is aware of that. He doesn’t need minders to protect him from questions regarding that, but it was clear he didn’t like the question. Since that special innings, fighting an injury in a triangular series final, Dhoni has averaged 63.35 and struck at 96.2 per 100 balls. These are great numbers for a No. 6, but there hasn’t been a Dhoni classic in this period. He has gone 27 games without a Man-of-the-Match award. Before that he won the award for the best player of the match once every 13 games on an average.Possibly Dhoni is a victim of his own legend. The finisher doesn’t get too many opportunities to finish a game in a manner that will enhance his reputation. An opener gets an opportunity every match, but a batsman like Dhoni only comes into real attention when the situation is dire. Bowlers wizen up to him too. The percentages go against him. He has to keep evolving, but Dhoni’s situation means he has had to evolve into a safer batsman.The game has changed around Dhoni. Two new balls and only four fielders outside the circle means a team cannot play more than six specialist batsmen. And India do not have the allrounder who can slot into that seventh spot. Every batsman has to be more responsible. Moreover Dhoni honed his one-day game in the company of dependable stalwarts such as Yuvraj Singh and Rahul Dravid. Now hardly a match goes by when at least one of the six main batsmen is not suspect. And then, when he carries out a rescue act almost successfully, as he did in Mohali against Australia with an unbeaten 139 from 76 for 4, his bowlers go out and lose the match. Just to rub it in, they lose it to the opposition’s No. 8. Just in case you had forgotten there are no hitters in your side after No. 6.Dhoni has lost all the freedom. There is a certain weariness to Dhoni’s game now. You saw that in Melbourne against Australia. He came in to bat at the end of the 35th over. Six wickets in hand in the last 15 overs is not too bad a scenario, but there was a strange circumspection to Dhoni’s batting. He fell for 19 off 31. He said he wanted to “delay the slog” because there wasn’t much batting behind him in Ravindra Jadeja’s absence, but in doing that, he began to play an unnatural game. You increasingly get a sense nowadays that Dhoni is not playing the ball but the situation, not just in that match but in the overall cricketing atmosphere.Is it also possible, though, that Dhoni’s game is on the wane? Recently he has been neutered twice, albeit in T20 cricket. These were situations he loves. Against Sri Lanka in the World T20 final, and against England in the one-off T20 international in Birmingham. Against Sri Lanka he came in to bat in the 19th over, but against the wide yorkers from Lasith Malinga he managed only 4 off 7. Once again it must not be forgotten that he had a limited window to make an impact, but he hardly used to fail in these windows before.The innings against England was probably the most instructive of all. When Dhoni came in, India needed 50 off 34 balls with seven wickets in hand, which nowadays is par for the course. But Dhoni first felt there was need to do something different, and asked for Jadeja to be promoted ahead of Ambati Rayudu. Then he kept farming the strike when batting with Rayudu until he had trusted himself too much and put himself under too much pressure.Maybe Dhoni has become too confident in his own legend. When you keep putting yourself under pressure too often, bowlers will come up with ways of bowling well at you in isolation. That is partly happening with Dhoni. His situation right now – and we are scrutinising such acceptable numbers only because it is Dhoni and his contribution to the side has never been a slave to numbers – is a mix of lack of trust – warranted or otherwise – in those around him, of bowlers becoming better at bowling at him, and a dash of over-confidence.India as a team too are headed the Dhoni way, in that momentum and form are not going to matter that much right now. The easy format of the World Cup allows them that luxury. To win the World Cup you need to win three high-pressure matches, and the passage to those three matches is quite easy. The World Cup will come alive for India only when they reach the quarter-final, which they should. Then will be the metaphorical three last overs. India have the experience of such high-pressure clashes played over a concentrated time. This is when Dhoni is good at not carrying scars from previous losses, just like he can shut out what happened in the previous 99 overs when he enters the 100th.This is when India will need Dhoni at his best. Maybe before that he should just let himself go. Maybe even bat higher in the order. Just not worry about the world around him too much for a change. Put himself to the test against bowlers who seem to have started bowling better at him, but without any unwanted pressure. Get the blood flowing in those arms. Get that bat used to hitting balls out of the grounds. This is possibly the last time he is taking the ODI team into the metaphorical last over on the big stage. Maybe he needs the freedom of the Batting Powerplay just before that.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus